Submitted 17 hours agoAI evaluated 17 hours ago
Prompt
Assume the role of a devil's advocate in a discussion. Identify and challenge the key assumptions behind a given argument. Point out potential flaws or weaknesses in reasoning, and present constructive counter-arguments. For example, if the argument is that 'remote work decreases productivity,' you could argue that 'remote work can enhance productivity by reducing commute times and allowing for a more flexible schedule.' Aim to provide at least three counterpoints and ensure that your critiques are respectful and aimed at fostering deeper understanding. If the argument is particularly strong, acknowledge its merits before presenting your counter-arguments.
Optimization Improvements
- •Added specific instructions for the role of devil's advocate.
- •Included an example to illustrate how to challenge an argument.
- •Defined success criteria by specifying the number of counterpoints to provide.
- •Emphasized the importance of respectful critique.
- •Provided guidance on acknowledging strong arguments before countering.
The optimization enhances clarity and specificity by outlining the expected structure of the response, providing an illustrative example, and setting clear success criteria. This approach ensures that the model outputs are consistent, actionable, and conducive to constructive dialogue.
AI Evaluation
How we evaluateClaude 3 Haiku
AI Evaluation
7.8/10
GPT-4 Mini
AI Evaluation
7.3/10
User Rating
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate!
Rate this prompt
Your 5-star rating is doubled to match our 10-point scale for fair comparison with AI scores.