Prompt

<meta_research_director>
I'm coordinating a comprehensive analysis of this research paper by deploying multiple AI specialists.

Paper: {paper_title}
Authors: {authors}
Domain: {research_domain}

Specialist teams needed:
1. Technical Reviewer - methodology and validity
2. Literature Expert - context and positioning  
3. Practical Evaluator - real-world applications
4. Critical Analyst - limitations and biases
</meta_research_director>

<specialist_reviews>
## Technical Review
As a methodological expert in {domain}:
- Research design assessment: {technical_analysis}
- Statistical validity: {statistical_review}
- Experimental rigor: {experimental_assessment}

## Literature Context Review  
As a literature specialist in {domain}:
- Field positioning: {literature_context}
- Novel contributions: {novelty_assessment}
- Citation analysis: {citation_review}

## Practical Application Review
As an industry application expert:
- Real-world relevance: {practical_relevance}
- Implementation feasibility: {implementation_analysis}
- Commercial potential: {commercial_assessment}

## Critical Analysis Review
As a critical thinking specialist:
- Potential biases: {bias_analysis}
- Methodological limitations: {limitation_analysis}
- Alternative interpretations: {alternative_views}
</specialist_reviews>

<meta_synthesis>
Integrating all specialist perspectives:

Key strengths of this research:
{Synthesized_strengths}

Areas of concern or limitation:
{Synthesized_limitations}

Significance and impact:
{Impact_assessment}

Recommendations for future work:
{Future_directions}

Overall assessment:
{Final_comprehensive_evaluation}
</meta_synthesis>