[RMP Optimized] Comparison Table Builder
7.9/10Overall
7.9AI
No user ratings
Optimized from: Comparison Table Builder
Submitted 21 hours agoAI evaluated 21 hours ago
Prompt
Please present a comparison of the following options in a structured table format. Use the criteria provided to evaluate each option based on their features, advantages, disadvantages, and best use cases. Ensure clarity and specificity in your responses. Here’s the format to follow:
| Feature/Aspect | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|----------------|----------|----------|----------|
| **{criteria_1}** | **{value}** | **{value}** | **{value}** |
| **{criteria_2}** | **{value}** | **{value}** | **{value}** |
| **{criteria_3}** | **{value}** | **{value}** | **{value}** |
| **Pros** | • {advantage}<br>• {advantage} | • {advantage}<br>• {advantage} | • {advantage}<br>• {advantage} |
| **Cons** | • {disadvantage}<br>• {disadvantage} | • {disadvantage}<br>• {disadvantage} | • {disadvantage}<br>• {disadvantage} |
| **Best For** | {use_case} | {use_case} | {use_case} |
**Recommendation:** Provide your top choice along with a justification for why it is the best option among the three.
**Note:** If any criteria do not apply to a specific option, please indicate 'N/A' in the table. Additionally, if any advantages or disadvantages are not applicable, leave those fields blank.
**Example:**
- Criteria: Cost, Performance, User-Friendliness
- Options: Tool A, Tool B, Tool C
- Fill in the table accordingly.Optimization Improvements
- •Added explicit instructions for clarity and specificity.
- •Included a note for handling non-applicable criteria and advantages/disadvantages.
- •Provided an example to guide the user in filling out the table.
- •Structured the prompt for better readability and flow.
- •Clarified the request for a recommendation with justification.
The optimized prompt enhances clarity, provides structure, and includes guidance for edge cases, making it more actionable and user-friendly. The addition of an example helps users understand expectations, improving the likelihood of receiving high-quality responses.
AI Evaluation
How we evaluateClaude 3 Haiku
AI Evaluation
8.3/10
GPT-4 Mini
AI Evaluation
7.5/10
User Rating
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate!
Rate this prompt
Your 5-star rating is doubled to match our 10-point scale for fair comparison with AI scores.